“Organizations are deploying AI agents while acting like agents of chaos themselves.”
We need to talk about the elephant in the room. Every executive is chasing AI like it’s the holy grail of business strategy, but most of them wouldn’t know what to do with it if they actually caught it.
MIT just published research proving this chaos is real. Their data shows 95% of generative AI projects fail to deliver meaningful business impact. Only 5% achieve rapid revenue acceleration. The rest stall, burn through budgets, and leave teams more confused than when they started.
Here’s what the headlines miss: it’s not the technology that’s failing. It’s the approach. Organizations are treating AI like their North Star, their differentiator, their entire business plan rolled into one shiny package.
The Joker once said something that perfectly captures what I’m seeing across the industry: “I’m a dog chasing cars. I wouldn’t know what to do with one if I caught it! I’m not a schemer. I’m an agent of chaos.”
That’s exactly where we are. Organizations are deploying AI agents while acting like agents of chaos themselves.
When AI Strategy Becomes Content Chaos
Fortune recently profiled CEO Eric Vaughan of IgniteTech, who mandated “AI Mondays”—no customer calls, no budgets, only AI projects. When his team wasn’t fully on board, his solution was replacing nearly 80% of his staff within a year.
This extreme case reflects a widespread pattern affecting marketing teams everywhere. When executives decide their company needs to be perceived as an “AI company,” the mandate trickles down to content strategy, campaign messaging, and go-to-market approaches in ways that have nothing to do with customer needs.
Marketing teams suddenly find themselves tasked with creating AI-themed content, integrating AI terminology into campaigns, and developing messaging around artificial intelligence for audiences who aren’t searching for or interested in AI from their company. Content calendars get hijacked by AI topics. Campaign themes shift toward technology rather than customer problems.
The result? Marketing professionals creating content to satisfy internal AI mandates rather than customer needs. Blog posts about AI capabilities when customers want industry insights. Social content focused on technology rather than solutions.
And you’ve seen it too, haven’t you? The endless LinkedIn scrolls of AI thought leadership, everyone claiming they’ve figured it out, all selling the next tool or framework that will finally make AI work for your business. This constant noise adds pressure on marketing teams to find the magic solution while executives point to these posts as proof that “everyone else is doing AI marketing successfully.”
*Marketing professionals find themselves creating content to prove the company is ‘AI-forward’ rather than content that serves their audience.
Teams are forced to jump on the AI freight train without data supporting that their audiences are even at the station.
The Strategy Void Behind AI Mandates
What I’m witnessing across marketing operations isn’t just chaos, it’s the predictable result of treating technology as strategy instead of an enabler.
When executives announce “we need to be AI-first,” they think they’re being strategic. They’re not. They’re expressing FOMO and pushing that anxiety down to marketing teams who inherit the impossible task of creating actual strategy from a technology mandate. Digital transformation strategist Ema Roloff has been calling this out for years: technology is not a strategy, no matter how powerful the tool.
The human cost is obvious when marketing professionals are expected to become AI content experts overnight with zero support. Teams scramble to figure out AI messaging without understanding what AI can actually deliver for their customers. This is exactly backwards from what works: you need to invest in people first, giving teams digital literacy training and resources before expecting integration, as Ema discusses in her video on AI adoption.
What’s burning out marketing teams is this constant FOMO-driven pivoting. When organizational strategy becomes “don’t get left behind,” teams face endless changes. Content strategies shift mid-campaign. Messaging changes without audience research. Success gets measured by AI initiative participation rather than campaign performance. Ema’s analysis of FOMO-driven change perfectly captures why this approach consistently fails.
The pattern is exhausting and predictable: executives announce AI strategies, marketing teams attempt to translate vague mandates into content and campaigns, initiatives fail because they weren’t based on customer needs, and teams get blamed for poor execution of poorly defined strategies.
The Executive Accountability Problem
Here’s where the real breakdown occurs: executives making AI mandates without understanding what they’re asking marketing teams to execute.
AI automation expert Brand Nat emphasizes that leaders cannot outsource AI success, but the problem goes deeper than tool literacy. Executives announce comprehensive AI strategies without comprehending the content creation, campaign development, audience research, and workflow integration required to make those strategies work.
They ask marketing teams to generate leads through AI without understanding what that requires. They expect immediate ROI from initiatives they can’t properly define or support. They mandate AI-themed content for audiences who aren’t searching for AI solutions from their company.
*This feels exactly like the birth of the internet. In the beginning, nobody knew how to use it. People were scared.
I’m reminded of my healthcare friends who tell me that nurses are often more like doctors because they actually do the work and know the patients. They’re on the floor. That’s the gap in AI initiatives: executives making strategic announcements without understanding the day-to-day reality of campaign execution and content creation.
This feels exactly like the birth of the internet. In the beginning, nobody knew how to use it. People were scared. I remember reports about it being terrible and risky. The same patterns are happening now: people are always afraid of what they don’t know. But this time, the learning curve is being pushed down to individual marketing professionals while executives make strategic announcements they can’t support with education or resources.
When leadership crafts AI announcements using AI tools to communicate about adopting AI, the disconnect becomes obvious to everyone except the executives themselves. Teams recognize the gap between what’s being communicated and what’s actually needed to execute.
The result: marketing professionals abandon AI tools mid-project because they take longer than traditional approaches, yet face continued pressure to pursue AI solutions that don’t serve their campaigns or audiences.
When AI Strategy Hijacks Content Strategy
When executives treat AI as their organizational strategy, it fundamentally corrupts how marketing teams approach content creation. Instead of starting with customer needs and business objectives, teams are forced to reverse-engineer content around AI mandates.
Marketing professionals find themselves creating content to prove the company is “AI-forward” rather than content that serves their audience. Blog calendars get reorganized around AI topics regardless of customer interest. Campaign messaging shifts from problem-solving to technology showcasing. Email strategies pivot toward AI capabilities when subscribers signed up for industry insights.
The fundamental marketing principle gets inverted: instead of talking about audience needs and challenges, companies start boasting about their own technology capabilities. Effective marketing requires earning trust by acknowledging your audience’s reality, relating to their problems, and consistently providing value so that when they’re ready to buy, you’re top of mind. But AI-as-strategy thinking flips this relationship, making the company and its technology the hero of every story rather than the customer.
The Human Cost of Backwards Strategy
The psychological toll on marketing professionals is significant. There’s a growing phenomenon of “job hugging”: marketing professionals staying with current positions because the market feels unstable and they’re competing with unclear AI mandates everywhere they look.
Teams report feeling busy for busy’s sake, where success is measured by AI content production rather than engagement metrics, lead quality, or customer satisfaction. The constant pressure to create AI-themed marketing materials without audience validation creates stress that undermines effective performance.
This isn’t about bad execution. This is about being asked to execute backwards strategy where the tool became the objective instead of serving customer-focused goals.
Looking Forward: The Survivors and the Cautionary Tales
The organizations treating AI as their marketing strategy will burn out their teams while competitors quietly build sustainable competitive advantages through strategic AI application.
Five years from now, we’ll look back on this period like the dot-com boom: lots of hype, wasted marketing budgets, but the useful applications survived and became invisible parts of effective campaigns.
The marketing operations professionals who survive will be those who used AI to enhance their strategic thinking, content creation, and campaign execution without losing focus on audience needs and business outcomes.
The cautionary tales will be companies that reorganized entire marketing approaches around AI mandates while forgetting that effective marketing starts with understanding customers, not chasing technology trends.
*When executives treat AI as their strategy, they’re not being strategic. They’re avoiding strategy.
I’m reminded of my healthcare friends who tell me that nurses are often more like doctors because they actually do the work and know the patients. They’re on the floor. That’s the gap in AI initiatives: executives making strategic announcements without understanding the day-to-day reality of campaign execution and content creation.
This feels exactly like the birth of the internet. In the beginning, nobody knew how to use it. People were scared. I remember reports about it being terrible and risky. The same patterns are happening now: people are always afraid of what they don’t know. But this time, the learning curve is being pushed down to individual marketing professionals while executives make strategic announcements they can’t support with education or resources.
When leadership crafts AI announcements using AI tools to communicate about adopting AI, the disconnect becomes obvious to everyone except the executives themselves. Teams recognize the gap between what’s being communicated and what’s actually needed to execute.
The result: marketing professionals abandon AI tools mid-project because they take longer than traditional approaches, yet face continued pressure to pursue AI solutions that don’t serve their campaigns or audiences.
When AI Strategy Hijacks Content Strategy
When executives treat AI as their organizational strategy, it fundamentally corrupts how marketing teams approach content creation. Instead of starting with customer needs and business objectives, teams are forced to reverse-engineer content around AI mandates.
Marketing professionals find themselves creating content to prove the company is “AI-forward” rather than content that serves their audience. Blog calendars get reorganized around AI topics regardless of customer interest. Campaign messaging shifts from problem-solving to technology showcasing. Email strategies pivot toward AI capabilities when subscribers signed up for industry insights.
The fundamental marketing principle gets inverted: instead of talking about audience needs and challenges, companies start boasting about their own technology capabilities. Effective marketing requires earning trust by acknowledging your audience’s reality, relating to their problems, and consistently providing value so that when they’re ready to buy, you’re top of mind. But AI-as-strategy thinking flips this relationship, making the company and its technology the hero of every story rather than the customer.
The Human Cost of Backwards Strategy
The psychological toll on marketing professionals is significant. There’s a growing phenomenon of “job hugging”: marketing professionals staying with current positions because the market feels unstable and they’re competing with unclear AI mandates everywhere they look.
Teams report feeling busy for busy’s sake, where success is measured by AI content production rather than engagement metrics, lead quality, or customer satisfaction. The constant pressure to create AI-themed marketing materials without audience validation creates stress that undermines effective performance.
This isn’t about bad execution. This is about being asked to execute backwards strategy where the tool became the objective instead of serving customer-focused goals.
Looking Forward: The Survivors and the Cautionary Tales
The organizations treating AI as their marketing strategy will burn out their teams while competitors quietly build sustainable competitive advantages through strategic AI application.
Five years from now, we’ll look back on this period like the dot-com boom: lots of hype, wasted marketing budgets, but the useful applications survived and became invisible parts of effective campaigns.
The marketing operations professionals who survive will be those who used AI to enhance their strategic thinking, content creation, and campaign execution without losing focus on audience needs and business outcomes.
The cautionary tales will be companies that reorganized entire marketing approaches around AI mandates while forgetting that effective marketing starts with understanding customers, not chasing technology trends.
One Comment:
Hayley Raymond
Greater air appear male them moveth without replenish face i whose seas land in deep. Abundantly after brought firmament. Behold created two earth above isn\’t, doesn\’t face.