Paid Media · Case Study
Paid Media
Performance
Less spend, far more traffic, fewer conversions. A year-over-year read on what actually happened.
- Role
- Paid Media Strategy & Analysis
- Channels
- Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads
- Period
- Year over year
- Output
- Performance analysis
year over year
current year
sessions
change
01
The challenge.
A year-over-year spend reduction paired with a major increase in paid sessions, while total conversion volume declined.
| Metric | Prior year | Current year | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total spend | $149,627.14 | $108,696.56 | −27.4% |
| Total conversions | 236 | 73 | −69.1% |
| Paid sessions | — | 64,126 | +517.9% |
02
The approach.
Stay inside what the exports explicitly show. Claim nothing the data does not support.
This analysis does not assert why performance changed or what optimizations were executed unless the dashboard states it. Each metric stays tied to the panel it came from.
- 01
Web traffic panel. Paid sessions for the current year and the percent change against the previous period.
- 02
Combined metrics annually. Blended year-over-year paid totals for impressions, clicks, conversions, and spend.
- 03
Platform PPC panels. Google and LinkedIn performance snapshots, per the dashboard date range.
03
What the data
supports.
Spend efficiency improved sharply. Conversion capture did not follow.
The account bought dramatically more traffic for meaningfully less money, which is a real media-buying result. The gap sits downstream of the click, where conversion volume fell by more than the traffic gain can explain through efficiency alone.
That points at conversion tracking, landing page fit, or lead quality definition rather than at the media buy itself. Confirming which one requires data the dashboard exports do not contain.
Next project